Thursday, July 19, 2012

YouTube:How to Post & Share A Video On Facebook

YouTube:How to Share a Video

YouTube:To Make Your Own Profile Icon

YouTube:How to Upload a Video newest version

YouTube: to make video private

YouTube: How To Advertise without Video

YouTube:How To Advertise with Video

How to change YouTube channel name(2012)

Youtube: New channel edit tutorial HD 2012

YouTube:New homepage 2012

New YouTube version

Advocacy for YouTube old version

Point of view of old YouTube version

20 first videos posted on YouTube

A brief history of YouTube

Sunday, June 17, 2012

YouTube founders

YouTube cofounders:

Chad Hurley

Steve chen

Jawed Karim

The institutionalization of YouTube

YouTube has come to represent what video on the web looks like: short, mostly humorous and easily accessible. The short video clip pattern can also be found in mainstream media websites. Major media companies have responded to YouTube either by launching their own YouTube-like site or by introducing new video services on their own sites. Responding to professional video services in mainstream media, YouTube also offers full-length episodes of television shows.
Kim, J. (2012). The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-generated content   to professionally generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 34(1), 53-67. doi:10.1177/0163443711427199

Research priorities for YouTube and video-sharing technologies

Online video-sharing services, particularly YouTube, have gained an audience of billions of users including educators and scholars. While the academic literature provides some evidence that YouTube has been studied and written about, little is known about priorities for YouTube research. The study employed the Delphi method to obtain a consensus from experts about areas that are most in need of research in video-sharing technology (particularly YouTube). An expert panel, identified from a comprehensive review of the literature, participated in a three-round Delphi process involving two cycles of online questionnaires and feedback reports. Participants responded to the question, 'What should be the research priorities in video-sharing technologies (particularly YouTube) over the next 5 years?' Seven research priority categories were identified and ranked in order of priority: (1) users, groups and communities; (2) teaching/learning; (3) social/ political impact; (4) video creation/production; (5) legal/ethical; (6) media management; and (7) commercial interests.
Snelson, C., Rice, K., & Wyzard, C. (2012). Research priorities for YouTube and video-sharing technologies: A Delphi study. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 43(1), 119-129. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01168.x

KevJumba and the adolescence of YouTube

To the millions of videos circulating on YouTube, a teenager who calls himself
‘KevJumba’ has contributed 34.1 They rarely exceed five minutes, and he gives
them all titles, names like “The Real Me” (May 4, 2007), “I Need Help with
Females” (May 29, 2007), “The Mac is Great for Porn” (December 7, 2007), and
“High School” (November 1, 2007). In most of them, KevJumba—whom regular
viewers know as Kevin, a Chinese American teenager living with his parents in Texas—follows an uncomplicated format. He sits at a desk in his sparsely
adorned bedroom and speaks into a still, digital camera that tightly frames him
from the shoulders up. The simplicity of this format, however, belies a more
complicated visual and auditory aesthetic performed in the videos. These are
slickly produced, fast-paced vignettes that rely on an editing style where quick
cuts, hip-hop beats, voice-overs, random dancing, role-playing, and talk intersperse
in comprising the narration of himself and of his world that KevJumba articulates
as he broadcasts from his bedroom desk. Three of these broadcasts have amassed
view counts that reach into the millions.2 In addition, with each new KevJumba
video come thousands of comments on YouTube message boards and an array
of video responses. In the world of YouTube, where countless young people post
and share videos, KevJumba’s status is exceptional. His videos are a repository of
connectivity for adolescents from around the world, who come together to view
and exchange information about what they see.
Saul, R. (2010). KevJumba and the Adolescence of YouTube. Educational Studies, 46(5), 457-477. doi:10.1080/00131946.2010.510404

YouTube: educational potentials and pitfalls

Educators are just beginning to realize the educational value of YouTube
(Bloom, 2009). YouTube is a viable Web 2.0 technology that educators can
use in instruction in multiple ways. Although potential challenges exist because
of copyright and access, there are ways around that. YouTube is
an innovative technology tool that teachers can commit to using in their
classrooms as they engage 21st century learners. However, teachers must
be cautioned against using the technology simply because it is there. Verifying
the credibility of each video that is viewed and evaluating each
one for quality is a must when maximizing the YouTube experience for
students.
JONES, T., & CUTHRELL, K. (2011). YouTube: Educational Potentials and Pitfalls. Computers In The Schools, 28(1), 75-85. doi:10.1080/07380569.2011.553149

YouTube participatory culture

The explosion of youth subscription to original content-mediasharing
Web sites such as YouTube has confi rmed their relevance
and importance in the lives of today’s youth. These Web sites combine
media production and distribution with social networking
features, making them an ideal place to create, connect, collaborate,
and circulate novel and personally meaningful media. By
merging the technical aspects of youth as media creators with the
social aspects of youth as social networkers, new media platforms
such as YouTube offer a participatory culture in which to develop,
interact, and learn.
Chau, C. (2010). YouTube as a participatory culture. New Directions For Youth Development, 2010(128), 65-74. doi:10.1002/yd.376